Given his age and background, high-stakes poker and pro site operator Phil Galfond, tweeted a somewhat controversial opinion on Hellmuth late Tuesday.
In Galfond’s opinion, Hellmuth actually had several advantages.
Before the Moneymaking boom, less math was used in developing strategy. Hellmuth is definitely one of the best in the world when it comes to feeling-based strategies that are far more exploitative than those employed by many of today’s top professionals. As games progress and high roller events emerge visit dewapoker, it becomes clear that the players in the tournament lack respect for the game.
Galfond revealed four screenshots from his mobile notepad, outlining his thoughts on Hellmuth’s recent head-up play against Antonio Esfandiari in PokerGO’s “High Stakes Duel”. This is one of the rare times in which a player of Galfond’s age and caliber has outwardly praised Hellmuth’s poker skills.
We so often criticize the dramas we see on TV from the comfort of our couches. I think it’s fair to give credit where credit is due.
Many of these games based their best judgment on what was right from Game Theory Optimal [GTO]. GTO is very math based and requires a lot of learning. Players using this strategy generally end up understanding how often certain hands should take certain actions and how to shuffle the game to prevent being exploited by their opponents.
Hellmuth didn’t really consider that method. He’s still old school, feels like a core player. He famously describes his game as using “white magic” to show his opponent’s hole cards.